Executive Summary
A short reflection on why your Minimum Viable Product is neither minimum nor viable.
The biggest mistake founders make is assuming their MVP needs to be a fully polished application. In reality, your MVP should be a landing page and a prayer. If you are spending more than two weekends on an MVP, you are not building an MVP; you are avoiding the fear of rejection. You keep adding features because features feel like progress, but true progress is putting something embarrassing in front of a user and letting them tear it apart. The biggest mistake founders make is assuming their MVP needs to be a fully polished application. In reality, your MVP should be a landing page and a prayer. If you are spending more than two weekends on an MVP, you are not building an MVP; you are avoiding the fear of rejection. You keep adding features because features feel like progress, but true progress is putting something embarrassing in front of a user and letting them tear it apart. The biggest mistake founders make is assuming their MVP needs to be a fully polished application. In reality, your MVP should be a landing page and a prayer. If you are spending more than two weekends on an MVP, you are not building an MVP; you are avoiding the fear of rejection. You keep adding features because features feel like progress, but true progress is putting something embarrassing in front of a user and letting them tear it apart. The biggest mistake founders make is assuming their MVP needs to be a fully polished application. In reality, your MVP should be a landing page and a prayer. If you are spending more than two weekends on an MVP, you are not building an MVP; you are avoiding the fear of rejection. You keep adding features because features feel like progress, but true progress is putting something embarrassing in front of a user and letting them tear it apart. The biggest mistake founders make is assuming their MVP needs to be a fully polished application. In reality, your MVP should be a landing page and a prayer. If you are spending more than two weekends on an MVP, you are not building an MVP; you are avoiding the fear of rejection. You keep adding features because features feel like progress, but true progress is putting something embarrassing in front of a user and letting them tear it apart.
"If you are not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you launched too late. And if you are still adding buttons to a product nobody uses, you are just doing expensive typing.
Stop coding. Start talking to people. Your brilliant architecture means nothing if the fundamental premise of the business is flawed. Build less, validate more. That is the only way to fail fast enough to eventually succeed. Stop coding. Start talking to people. Your brilliant architecture means nothing if the fundamental premise of the business is flawed. Build less, validate more. That is the only way to fail fast enough to eventually succeed. Stop coding. Start talking to people. Your brilliant architecture means nothing if the fundamental premise of the business is flawed. Build less, validate more. That is the only way to fail fast enough to eventually succeed. Stop coding. Start talking to people. Your brilliant architecture means nothing if the fundamental premise of the business is flawed. Build less, validate more. That is the only way to fail fast enough to eventually succeed.
